Español | Français | Home
Return to Homepage
Search the Site Flickr Twitter Facebook Google Plus
Newsletter newsletter signup
Search the Site
Featured Publication featured publication
From Climate-Smart Agriculture to Climate-Smart Landscapes From Climate-Smart Agriculture to Climate-Smart Landscapes
Sara Scherr, Seth Shames, Rachel Friedman

More Pubs Search the Site

Support Us how to help

Support Us
Take Action

CFC Campaign

Aid For Africa

« Back to Full Listings

Publications and Reports » Details

Institutional innovations in African smallholder carbon projects

CCAFS Report 8

 

Shames, S., Wollenberg, E., Buck, L. E., Kristjanson, P., Masiga, M., Biryahaho, B.

 

Download GET DOCUMENT

 

 

Abstract

This paper synthesizes the insights of six African agricultural carbon project case studies and identifies institutional innovations among these projects that are contributing to long-term project success while maximizing benefits and minimizing risk for participating farmers. We review project organization and management, the structure and role of community groups within the projects, costs and benefits for managers and farmers, strategies to manage risks to farmers, and efforts to support women’s participation. Projects have developed organizational systems for financial management, agricultural extension, and carbon monitoring. All of these were managed by project management entities, with farmers implementing practices and supporting monitoring systems. Most projects engaged farmers in small groups and larger clusters of groups, which enabled broad participation, efficient contracting, timely communication, provision of extension services, benefit-sharing, and gender-focused activities. Direct carbon payments to farmers were low. Consequently projects needed to manage expectations around benefits carefully, support more efficient systems of aggregation and ensure non-cash benefits for farmers. Managing power dynamics within and among farmer groups was a significant challenge to ensuring equitable decision-making and participation. Mechanisms for settling conflict over land and benefits were also critical. We present action research questions that emerged from the first phase of this work and discuss the future of the initiative. Case studies about each agriculture carbon project from which our analysis is drawn can be downloaded from the CCAFS website.

 

Document Stats:

Release Date: July 2012
File Type: PDF [PDF]
File Size: 3204 KB
Journal:

 

Copyright Ecoagriculture Partners. All Rights Reserved.
1100 17th Street N.W. | Suite 600 | Washington, D.C. 20036 USA | Tel: +1 202 393 5315 | Fax: +1 202 393 2424 | info@ecoagriculture.org