Publication Details

Screen Shot 2016-07-19 at 1.21.22 PM
Download

Copyright Information

© 2016 The Author(s). Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For details view the article on the journal Agriculture & Food Security‘s website.

Building local institutional capacity to implement agricultural carbon projects

Participatory action research with Vi Agroforestry in Kenya and ECOTRUST in Uganda

Authors

Publishers

  • BioMed Central

Date

July 19, 2016

Short Summary

This Participatory Action Research study published in Agriculture & Food Security focuses on two innovative models for smallholder agricultural carbon projects, and investigates how local actors could take on expanded roles within the projects. Increasing local participation in the management and implementation of carbon projects is critical for their durability and scalability.

Summary

Smallholders have begun to take advantage of a growing pool of investment in climate change mitigation. Meanwhile, early movers in this area are working to develop innovative models that will allow projects to be financially sustainable and scalable while benefiting local actors. This study, published in the journal Agriculture & Food Security, focuses on two of these projects in East Africa, managed by Vi Agroforestry in Kenya and ECOTRUST in Uganda. They engaged in a participatory action research process to identify ways that local actors could take on expanded roles within the projects.

Results

Results are presented as case studies which include project context, roles of local project actors, actions selected, and the outcomes of the actions on the key actors targeted. The actions focused on building the capacities of community-based intermediaries, facilitating partnerships with local government and local non-governmental organizations, and supporting a more active role played by women. Key findings from this process were that community-based intermediaries can play a leading role in land management trainings; local government involvement is critical to project success; local non-governmental organizations and businesses can play central roles in training and providing market incentives to farmers to implement sustainable practices; and women’s roles in projects can grow if project benefits are aligned with their needs and trainings are made more accessible.

Conclusions

These cases demonstrate that there is substantial scope for the responsibilities within agricultural carbon projects, and by extension climate-smart agriculture initiatives more broadly, to be institutionalized at the local level. However, regardless of the institutional setup, due to carbon market factors beyond the control of these projects, the financial case for smallholder projects that rely solely on financing from carbon credits remains challenging to these projects and others like them. As programmatic and policy-led approaches grow from these project models, it may be easier to find ways to integrate carbon financing with support for climate change adaptation, rural development, and ecosystem services provision. With these new models, the ability to institutionalize management and implementation capacity at the local level will remain critically important.

This study was supported by the CGIAR Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security research program (CCAFS).

Related Stories

Related Publications